RFC 8960 | MPLS Base YANG Data Model | December 2020 |
Saad, et al. | Standards Track | [Page] |
This document contains a specification of the MPLS base YANG data model. The MPLS base YANG data model serves as a base framework for configuring and managing an MPLS switching subsystem on an MPLS-enabled router. It is expected that other MPLS YANG data models (e.g., MPLS Label Switched Path (LSP) static, LDP, or RSVP-TE YANG data models) will augment the MPLS base YANG data model.¶
This is an Internet Standards Track document.¶
This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has received public review and has been approved for publication by the Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Further information on Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 7841.¶
Information about the current status of this document, any errata, and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8960.¶
Copyright (c) 2020 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.¶
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License.¶
A core routing YANG data model is defined in [RFC8349]; it provides a basis for the development of routing data models for specific Address Families (AFs). Specifically, [RFC8349] defines a model for a generic Routing Information Base (RIB) that is AF agnostic. [RFC8349] also defines two instances of RIBs based on the generic RIB model for IPv4 and IPv6 AFs.¶
The MPLS base model defined in this document augments the generic RIB model defined in [RFC8349] with additional data that enables MPLS forwarding for one or more specific destination prefixes present in one or more AF RIBs, as described in the MPLS architecture document [RFC3031].¶
The MPLS base model also defines a new instance of the generic RIB YANG data model as defined in [RFC8349] to store native MPLS routes. The native MPLS RIB instance stores one or more routes that are not associated with other AF instance RIBs (such as IPv4 or IPv6 instance RIBs) but are enabled for MPLS forwarding. Examples of such native MPLS routes are routes programmed by RSVP on one or more transit MPLS routers along the path of a Label Switched Path (LSP). Other examples are MPLS routes that cross-connect to specific Layer 2 adjacencies, such as Layer 2 Attachment Circuits (ACs); or Layer 3 adjacencies, such as Segment Routing (SR) Adjacency Segments (Adj-SIDs) as described in [RFC8402].¶
The MPLS base YANG data model serves as a basis for future development of MPLS YANG data models covering MPLS features and subsystems that are more sophisticated. The main purpose is to provide essential building blocks for other YANG data models involving different control-plane protocols and MPLS functions.¶
To this end, it is expected that the MPLS base data model will be augmented by a number of other YANG modules developed by the IETF (e.g., by the TEAS and MPLS Working Groups).¶
The YANG module defined in this document conforms to the Network Management Datastore Architecture (NMDA) [RFC8342].¶
The terminology for describing YANG data models is found in [RFC7950].¶
This document describes the "ietf-mpls" YANG module, which provides base components of the MPLS data model. It is expected that other MPLS YANG modules will augment the "ietf-mpls" YANG module for other MPLS extensions to provision LSPs (e.g., MPLS static, MPLS LDP, or MPLS RSVP-TE LSPs).¶
This document models MPLS-labeled routes as an augmentation of the generic routing RIB data model as defined in [RFC8349]. For example, IP prefix routes (e.g., routes stored in IPv4 or IPv6 RIBs) are augmented to carry additional data to enable them for MPLS forwarding.¶
This document also defines a new instance of the generic RIB model defined in [RFC8349] to store one or more native MPLS routes (described further in Section 2.3) by extending the identity "address-family" defined in [RFC8349] with a new "mpls" identity; see Section 3 of [RFC8349].¶
The "ietf-mpls" YANG module defines the following identities:¶
The "ietf-mpls" YANG module contains the following high-level types and groupings:¶
The NHLFE is used when forwarding a labeled packet. It contains the following information:¶
The operation to perform on the packet's label stack. This can be one of the following operations:¶
The NHLFE may also contain:¶
The MPLS routing model is based on the core routing data model defined in [RFC8349]. Figure 2 shows the extensions introduced by the MPLS base model on defined RIBs.¶
As shown in Figure 2, the MPLS base YANG data model augments defined instances of AF RIBs with additional data that enables MPLS forwarding for destination prefixes stored in such RIBs. For example, an IPv4 prefix stored in RIB(v4) is augmented to carry an MPLS local label and one or more per-next-hop remote labels to enable MPLS forwarding for such a prefix.¶
The MPLS base model also creates a separate instance of the generic RIB model defined in [RFC8349] to store one or more MPLS native routes that are enabled for MPLS forwarding but are not stored in one or more other AF RIBs.¶
Some examples of such native MPLS routes are:¶
The MPLS base tree diagram, which follows the notation defined in [RFC8340], is shown in Figure 3.¶
This section describes the "ietf-mpls" YANG module, which provides base components of the MPLS data model. Other YANG modules may import and augment the MPLS base module to add feature-specific data.¶
The "ietf-mpls" YANG module imports the following YANG modules:¶
This YANG module also references the following RFCs in defining the types, YANG groupings, and other features of the YANG module: [RFC3031], [RFC3032], [RFC4090], [RFC5714], and [RFC7424].¶
This document registers the following URI in the "ns" subregistry of the "IETF XML Registry" [RFC3688].¶
This document registers the following YANG module in the "YANG Module Names" registry [RFC6020].¶
The YANG module specified in this document defines a schema for data that is designed to be accessed via network management protocols such as NETCONF [RFC6241] or RESTCONF [RFC8040]. The lowest NETCONF layer is the secure transport layer, and the mandatory-to-implement secure transport is Secure Shell (SSH) [RFC6242]. The lowest RESTCONF layer is HTTPS, and the mandatory-to-implement secure transport is TLS [RFC8446].¶
The Network Configuration Access Control Model (NACM) [RFC8341] provides the means to restrict access for particular NETCONF or RESTCONF users to a preconfigured subset of all available NETCONF or RESTCONF protocol operations and content.¶
There are a number of data nodes defined in this YANG module that are writable/creatable/deletable (i.e., config true, which is the default). These data nodes may be considered sensitive or vulnerable in some network environments. Write operations (e.g., edit-config) to these data nodes without proper protection can have a negative effect on network operations. These are the subtrees and data nodes and their sensitivity/vulnerability:¶
Some of the readable data nodes in this YANG module may be considered sensitive or vulnerable in some network environments. It is thus important to control read access (e.g., via get, get-config, or notification) to these data nodes. These are the subtrees and data nodes and their sensitivity/vulnerability:¶
Some of the RPC operations in this YANG module may be considered sensitive or vulnerable in some network environments. It is thus important to control access to these operations. These are the operations and their sensitivity/vulnerability:¶
The security considerations spelled out in [RFC3031] and [RFC3032] apply for this document as well.¶
A simple network setup is shown in Figure 5. R1 runs the IS-IS routing protocol and learns about the reachability of two IPv4 prefixes (P1: 198.51.100.1/32 and P2: 198.51.100.2/32) and two IPv6 prefixes (P3: 2001:db8:0:10::1/128 and P4: 2001:db8:0:10::2/128). We also assume that R1 learns about local and remote MPLS label bindings for each prefix using IS-IS (e.g., using Segment Routing (SR) extensions).¶
The instance data tree could then be illustrated as shown in Figure 6, using JSON format [RFC7951]:¶
The authors would like to thank Xia Chen for her contributions to the early draft revisions of this document.¶