Internet-Draft Use of VAPID in JMAP WebPush November 2024
Gultsch Expires 28 May 2025 [Page]
Workgroup:
JMAP
Internet-Draft:
draft-ietf-jmap-webpush-vapid-05
Published:
Intended Status:
Standards Track
Expires:
Author:
D. Gultsch

Use of VAPID in JMAP WebPush

Abstract

This document defines a method for JMAP servers to advertise their capability to authenticate WebPush notifications using the Voluntary Application Server Identification protocol.

Status of This Memo

This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

This Internet-Draft will expire on 28 May 2025.

Table of Contents

1. Introduction

JMAP [RFC8620] specifies how clients can subscribe to events using a protocol that is compatible with WebPush [RFC8030]. Some push services require that the application server authenticates all push messages using the Voluntary Application Server Identification protocol [RFC8292]. To facilitate that, the client (or user agent in WebPush terminology) needs the VAPID public key of the application server to pass it along to the push service when retrieving a new endpoint.

2. Conventions Used in This Document

The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here. These words may also appear in this document in lower case as plain English words, absent their normative meanings.

3. Discovering Support for VAPID

The JMAP capabilities object is returned as part of the standard JMAP session object (see Section 2 of [RFC8620]). Servers supporting this specification MUST add a property called "urn:ietf:params:jmap:webpush-vapid" to the capabilities object. The value of this property is an object that MUST contain the following information:

4. Issuing Push Notifications

Every time the server sends a push message to a PushSubscription URL it MUST authenticate the POST request using the protocol outlined in [RFC8292]. This includes both StateChange events and PushVerification notifications. The server MUST use the application server key that was advertised in the capabilities object at the time the PushSubscription was created.

5. Key Rotation

When a server needs to replace its VAPID key, it MUST update the sessionState per [RFC8620]. The client MUST monitor the JMAP session object for changes to the VAPID key and MUST recreate its push subscription after detecting such a change.

After key rotation, the server MAY continue to send push notifications for existing push subscriptions using the old application server key for a transitional period. This allows clients time to recreate their respective push subscriptions. After the transitional period (or immediately for implementations that do not have one), the server MUST destroy push subscriptions that use the old key.

When destroying push subscriptions that include the data type PushSubscription, the server MAY issue one final StateChange push notification using the old URL and application server key to notify the client of changes to the PushSubscription data type. This prompts the client to make a PushSubscription/changes method call. The response to this call will contain an updated sessionState, which refers to a session object that contains the new VAPID key.

A race condition can occur when the server updates its VAPID key after the client has refreshed the session object but before calling the PushSubscription/set method. This situation causes the server to send a PushVerification object to a push resource URL that is now associated with an outdated VAPID key. Consequently, the push service will reject the PushVerification with a 403 (Forbidden) status code, as specified in [RFC8292].

To alleviate this problem, the client MUST check if the sessionState in the response from the PushSubscription/set method points to a session object with an applicationServerKey that matches their expectations. If there is a mismatch, the client MAY retry creating the PushSubscription. Additionally, the client MAY destroy the PushSubscription from the earlier, failed attempt.

6. Security Considerations

The security considerations for JMAP ([RFC8620], especially Section 8.6 and Section 8.7 of that document), WebPush ([RFC8030]) and VAPID ([RFC8292]) apply to this document.

7. IANA Considerations

7.1. Registration of the JMAP Capability for VAPID

This specification requests IANA to register a new capability in the JMAP Capabilities registry with the following data:

Capability Name: urn:ietf:params:jmap:webpush-vapid

Specification document: this document

Intended use: common

Change Controller: IETF

Security and privacy considerations: this document, Section 6

8. Normative References

[FIPS186]
National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), "Digital Signature Standard (DSS)", FIPS 186-4, , <https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.FIPS.186-4>.
[X9.62]
American National Standards Institute, "Public Key Cryptography for the Financial Services Industry: The Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm (ECDSA)", ANSI X9.62-2005, .
[RFC8620]
Jenkins, N. and C. Newman, "The JSON Meta Application Protocol (JMAP)", RFC 8620, DOI 10.17487/RFC8620, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8620>.
[RFC8030]
Thomson, M., Damaggio, E., and B. Raymor, Ed., "Generic Event Delivery Using HTTP Push", RFC 8030, DOI 10.17487/RFC8030, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8030>.
[RFC8292]
Thomson, M. and P. Beverloo, "Voluntary Application Server Identification (VAPID) for Web Push", RFC 8292, DOI 10.17487/RFC8292, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8292>.
[RFC2119]
Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.
[RFC8174]
Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>.
[RFC7515]
Jones, M., Bradley, J., and N. Sakimura, "JSON Web Signature (JWS)", RFC 7515, DOI 10.17487/RFC7515, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7515>.

Author's Address

Daniel Gultsch