Internet-Draft Security for IPv6 over OWC October 2024
Choi & Choi Expires 13 April 2025 [Page]
Workgroup:
6lo
Published:
Intended Status:
Informational
Expires:
Authors:
M. Choi, Ed.
ETRI
Y. Choi
ETRI

Security considerations for IPv6 Packets over Short-Range Optical Wireless Communications

Abstract

IEEE 802.15.7, "Short-Range Optical Wireless Communications" defines wireless communication using visible light. It defines how data is transmitted, modulated, and organized in order to enable reliable and efficient communication in various environments. The standard is designed to work alongside other wireless communication systems and supports both line-of-sight (LOS) and non-line-of-sight (NLOS) communications. This document describes security considerations for short-range optical wireless communications (OWC) using IPv6 over Low-Power Wireless Personal Area Network (6LoWPAN) techniques.

Status of This Memo

This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

This Internet-Draft will expire on 13 April 2025.

Table of Contents

1. Introduction

The rapid growth of the Internet of Things (IoT) has led to a significant increase in the number of wireless communication technologies utilized for real-time data collection and monitoring in various industrial domains, such as manufacturing, agriculture, healthcare, transportation, and so on. This trend highlights the importance of wireless communication in facilitating real-time data exchange and analysis, ultimately contributing to enhanced operational efficiency and decision-making processes across different industrial sectors.

Optical Wireless Communications (OWC) stands as one of the potential candidates for IoT wireless communication technologies, extensively applied across various industrial domains. The IEEE802.15.7 standard outlines the procedures for establishing bidirectional communications between two OWC devices. Furthermore, IEEE 802.15.7 delineates a comprehensive OWC standard, encompassing features like Visible Light Communication (VLC), Short-Range Communication, Line-of-Sight (LOS) and Non-Line-of-Sight (NLOS) Support, High and Low Data Rates, Energy Efficiency, and Secure Communication.

This document describes security considerations for IPv6 over Optical Wireless Communications.

2. Security Considerations

Optical Wireless Communication (OWC) systems introduce unique security concerns due to their reliance on visible or infrared light. Below are key security considerations.

2.1. Eavesdropping and Data Interception

Since OWC transmissions occur via light, they are more prone to interception if there is an unobstructed line of sight. Mitigation includes using directional communication, encryption of data, and limiting transmission power to reduce signal leakage.

2.2. Data Integrity

OWC may be affected by environmental factors like obstacles, reflections, or interference, which could corrupt data. Error detection and correction techniques such as checksums or cryptographic hashing are necessary to ensure data integrity.

2.3. Denial of Service (DoS) Attacks

OWC systems are susceptible to physical blockages or jamming attacks, where an attacker disrupts communication by introducing noise or obstructions. To mitigate this, the system could implement fallback mechanisms or use alternative communication pathways when a block is detected.

2.4. Authentication and Access Control

Devices connecting to the OWC network must be authenticated to prevent unauthorized access. Using mutual authentication protocols like DTLS (Datagram Transport Layer Security) can secure device communication.

2.5. Key Management

Secure key management is essential to ensure encryption and integrity. Methods like public-key infrastructure (PKI) or pre-shared keys should be employed to establish trust between OWC nodes.

2.6. Energy Efficiency and Security Trade-off

Given the low power nature of OWC systems, security protocols should be lightweight to minimize additional energy consumption while still providing sufficient security. Optimized encryption algorithms for resource-constrained environments, such as lightweight ciphers, can be considered.

3. IANA Considerations

None.

4. References

[RFC2119]
Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.
[RFC8174]
Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the members of the IETF 6lo Working Group.

Authors' Addresses

Munhwan Choi (editor)
Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute
218 Gajeongno, Yuseung-gu
Daejeon
34129
South Korea
Younghwan Choi
Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute
218 Gajeongno, Yuseung-gu
Daejeon
34129
South Korea