Network Working Group D. Peterson
Request for Comments: 3822 Computer Network Technology (CNT)
Category: Standards Track July 2004
Finding Fibre Channel over TCP/IP (FCIP) Entities
Using Service Location Protocol version 2 (SLPv2)
Status of this Memo
This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the
Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet
Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state
and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2004).
Abstract
This document defines the use of Service Location Protocol version 2
(SLPv2) by Fibre Channel over TCP/IP (FCIP) Entities.
1. Introduction
This document describes the use of the Service Location Protocol
version 2 in performing dynamic discovery of participating Fibre
Channel over TCP/IP (FCIP) Entities. Implementation guidelines,
service type templates, and security considerations are specified.
2. Notation Conventions
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].
3. Terminology
Here are some definitions that may aid readers that are unfamiliar
with either SLP or FCIP. Some of these definitions have been
reproduced from [RFC2608] and [RFC3105].
Peterson Standards Track [Page 1]
RFC 3822 Finding FCIP Entities Using SLPv2 July 2004
User Agent (UA) A process working on the client's behalf
to establish contact with some service.
The UA retrieves service information from
the Service Agents or Directory Agents.
Service Agent (SA) A process working on behalf of one or more
services to advertise the services and
their capabilities.
Directory Agent (DA) A process which collects service
advertisements. There can only be one DA
present per given host.
Scope A named set of services, typically making
up a logical administrative group.
Service Advertisement A URL, attributes, and a lifetime
(indicating how long the advertisement is
valid), providing service access
information and capabilities description
for a particular service.
FCIP Entity The principle FCIP interface point to the
IP network.
FCIP Entity Name The world wide name of the switch if the
FCIP Entity resides in a switch or the
world wide node name of the associated
Nx_Port.
FCIP Discovery Domain The FCIP Discovery Domain specifies which
FCIP Entities are allowed to discover each
other within the bounds of the scope.
4. Using SLPv2 for FCIP Service Discovery
At least two FCIP Entities must be involved in the entity discovery
process. The end result is that an FCIP Entity will discover one or
more peer FCIP Entities.
4.1. Discovering FCIP Entities using SLPv2
Figure 1 shows the relationship between FCIP Entities and their
associated SLPv2 agents.
Peterson Standards Track [Page 2]
RFC 3822 Finding FCIP Entities Using SLPv2 July 2004
+--------------------------------------+
| FCIP Entity |
+----------------------------------+ |
| FCIP Control and Services Module | |
+----------------+ | |
| SA | UA | | |
+----------------+-----------------+ |
| TCP/UDP/IP | |
+----------------+-----------------+ |
| Interface | |
| 192.0.2.10 | |
+----------------+-----------------+---|
|
+------------+ |
| SLPv2 DA |----+ IP Network
+------------+ |
|
+----------------+-----------------+---|
| Interface | |
| 192.0.2.20 | |
+----------------+-----------------+ |
| TCP/UDP/IP | |
+----------------+-----------------+ |
| SA | UA | | |
+----------------+ | |
| FCIP Control and Services Module | |
+--------------------------------- + |
| FCIP Entity |
+--------------------------------------+
Figure 1: FCIP Entity and SLPv2 Agent Relationship.
As indicated in Figure 1, each FCIP Entity contains an FCIP Control
and Services Module that interfaces to an SLPv2 SA and UA.
The SA constructs a service advertisement of the type
"service:fcip:entity" for each of the service URLs it wishes to
register. The service advertisement contains a lifetime, along with
other attributes defined in the service template.
The remainder of the discovery process is identical to that used by
any client/server pair implementing SLPv2:
1. If an SLPv2 DA is found [RFC2608], the SA contacts the DA and
registers the service advertisement. Whether or not one or more
SLPv2 DAs are discovered, the SA maintains the service
advertisement itself and answers multicast UA queries directly.
Peterson Standards Track [Page 3]
RFC 3822 Finding FCIP Entities Using SLPv2 July 2004
2. When the FCIP Entity requires contact information for a peer FCIP
Entity, the UA either contacts the DA using unicast or the SA
using multicast using an SLPv2 service request. The UA service
request includes a query, based on the attributes, to indicate the
characteristics of the peer FCIP Entities it requires.
3. Once the UA has the IP address and port number of a peer FCIP
Entity, it may begin the normal connection procedure, as described
in [RFC3821], to a peer FCIP Entity.
The use of a DA is RECOMMENDED for SLPv2 operations in an FCIP
environment.
4.1.1. FCIP Discovery Domains
The concept of a discovery domain provides further granularity of
control of allowed discovery between FCIP Entities within a specific
SLPv2 scope.
Figure 2 shows an example relationship between FCIP Entities and
their associated discovery domains within a specified SLPv2 scope.
=================fcip=======================================
= =
= *************************purple*********************** =
= * * =
= * #####orange###################### * =
= * # ------------ //////blue//////+/////////////// * =
= * # | FCIP | / # / * =
= * # | Entity A | / # / * =
= * # ------------ / # ------------ / * =
= * # / # | FCIP | / * =
= * # / # | Entity C | / * =
= * # / ------------ # ------------ / * =
= * # / | FCIP | # / * =
= * # / | Entity B | # / * =
= * # / ------------ # / * =
= * ################+################ / * =
= * //////////////////////////////// * =
= * * =
= ****************************************************** =
= =
============================================================
Figure 2: FCIP Entity and Discovery Domain Example.
Peterson Standards Track [Page 4]
RFC 3822 Finding FCIP Entities Using SLPv2 July 2004
Within the specified scope "fcip", the administrator has defined a
discovery domain "purple", allowing FCIP Entities A, B, and C to
discover each other. This discovery domain is illustrated using the
"*" character.
Within the specified scope "fcip", the administrator has defined a
discovery domain "orange", allowing FCIP Entity A to discover FCIP
Entity B, but not FCIP Entity C. This discovery domain is
illustrated using the "#" character.
Within the specified scope "fcip", the administrator has defined a
discovery domain "blue", allowing FCIP Entity C to discover FCIP
Entity B, but not FCIP Entity A. This discovery domain is
illustrated using the "/" character.
For the example relationship shown in Figure 2, the value of the
fcip-discovery-domain attribute for each FCIP Entity is as follows:
FCIP Entity A = orange,purple
FCIP Entity B = orange,blue,purple
FCIP Entity C = blue,purple
5. FCIP SLPv2 Templates
Two templates are provided: an FCIP Entity template, and an abstract
template to provide a means of adding other FCIP related templates in
the future.
5.1. The FCIP Abstract Service Type Template
This template defines the abstract service "service:fcip". It is
used as a top-level service to encapsulate all other FCIP related
services.
Name of submitter: David Peterson
Language of service template: en
Security Considerations: see section 6.
Template Text:
-------------------------template begins here-----------------------
template-type=fcip
template-version=0.1
template-description=
This is an abstract service type. The purpose of the fcip service
Peterson Standards Track [Page 5]
RFC 3822 Finding FCIP Entities Using SLPv2 July 2004
type is to encompass all of the services used to support the FCIP
protocol.
template-url-syntax =
url-path= ; Depends on the concrete service type.
--------------------------template ends here------------------------
5.2. The FCIP Entity Concrete Service Type Template
This template defines the service "service:fcip:entity". A device
containing FCIP Entities that wishes to have them discovered via
SLPv2 would register each of them with each of their addresses, as
this service type.
FCIP Entities wishing to discover other FCIP Entities in this manner
will generally use one of the following example query strings:
1. Find a specific FCIP Entity, given its FCIP Entity Name:
Service: service:fcip:entity
Scope: fcip-entity-scope-list
Query: (fcip-entity-name=\ff\10\00\00\60\69\20\34\0C)
2. Find all of the FCIP Entities within a specified FCIP Discovery
Domain:
Service: service:fcip:entity
Scope: fcip-entity-scope-list
Query: (fcip-discovery-domain=fcip-discovery-domain-name)
3. In addition, a management application may wish to discover all
FCIP Entities:
Service: service:fcip:entity
Scope: management-service-scope-list
Query: none
Name of submitter: David Peterson
Language of service template: en
Security Considerations: see section 6.
Template Text:
-------------------------template begins here-----------------------
template-type=fcip:entity
template-version=0.1
Peterson Standards Track [Page 6]
RFC 3822 Finding FCIP Entities Using SLPv2 July 2004
template-description=
This is a concrete service type. The fcip:entity service type is
used to register individual FCIP Entity addresses to be discovered
by others. UAs will generally search for these by including one of
the following:
- the FCIP Entity Name for which an address is needed
- the FCIP Discovery Domain Name for which addresses are requested
- the service URL
template-url-syntax =
url-path = hostport
hostport = host [ ":" port ]
host = hostname / hostnumber
hostname = *( domainlabel "." ) toplabel
alphanum = ALPHA / DIGIT
domainlabel = alphanum / alphanum * [alphanum / "-"] alphanum
toplabel = ALPHA / ALPHA * [ alphanum / "-" ] alphanum
hostnumber = ipv4-number
ipv4-number = 1*3DIGIT 3("." 1*3DIGIT)
port = 1*DIGIT
;
; A DNS host name should be used along with the well-known
; IANA FCIP port number for operation with NAT/NAPT devices.
;
; Examples:
; service:fcip:entity://host.example.com
; service:fcip:entity://192.0.2.0:4000
;
fcip-entity-name = opaque L
# If the FCIP Entity is a VE_Port/B_Access implementation [FC-BB-2]
# residing in a switch, the fcip-entity-name is the Fibre Channel
# Switch Name [FC-SW-3]. Otherwise, the fcip-entity-name is the
# Fibre Channel Node Name [FC-FS] of the port (e.g., an Nx_Port)
# associated with the FCIP Entity.
# An entity representing multiple endpoints must register each of
# the endpoints using SLPv2.
transports = string M L
tcp
# This is a list of transport protocols that the registered entity
# supports. FCIP is currently supported over TCP only.
tcp
Peterson Standards Track [Page 7]
RFC 3822 Finding FCIP Entities Using SLPv2 July 2004
mgmt-entity = string M O L
# The URL's of the management interface(s) are appropriate for SNMP,
# web-based, or telnet management of the FCIP Entity.
# Examples:
# http://fcipentity.example.com:1080/
# telnet://fcipentity.example.com
fcip-discovery-domain = string M L
fcip
# The fcip-discovery-domain string contains the name(s) of the FCIP
# discovery domain(s) to which this FCIP Entity belongs.
--------------------------template ends here------------------------
6. Security Considerations
The SLPv2 security model as specified in [RFC2608] does not provide
confidentiality, but does provide an authentication mechanism for UAs
to assure that service advertisements only come from trusted SAs with
the exception that it does not provide a mechanism for authenticating
"zero-result responses". See [RFC3723] for a discussion of the SLPv2
[RFC2608] security model.
Once an FCIP Entity is discovered, authentication and authorization
are handled by the FCIP protocol. It is the responsibility of the
providers of these services to ensure that an inappropriately
advertised or discovered service does not compromise their security.
When no security is used for SLPv2, there is a risk of distribution
of false discovery information. The primary countermeasure for this
risk is authentication. When this risk is a significant concern,
IPsec SAs SHOULD be used for FCIP traffic subject to this risk to
ensure that FCIP traffic only flows between endpoints that have
participated in IKE authentication. For example, if an attacker
distributes discovery information falsely claiming that it is an FCIP
endpoint, it will lack the secret information necessary to
successfully complete IKE authentication, and hence will be prevented
from falsely sending or receiving FCIP traffic.
There remains a risk of a denial of service attack based on repeated
use of false discovery information that will cause the initiation of
IKE negotiation. The countermeasures for this are administrative
configuration of each FCIP Entity to limit the peers that it is
willing to communicate with (i.e., by IP address range and/or DNS
domain), and maintenance of a negative authentication cache to avoid
repeatedly contacting an FCIP Entity that fails to authenticate.
These three measures (i.e., IP address range limits, DNS domain
limits, negative authentication cache) MUST be implemented.
Peterson Standards Track [Page 8]
RFC 3822 Finding FCIP Entities Using SLPv2 July 2004
6.1. Security Implementation
Security for SLPv2 in an IP storage environment is specified in
[RFC3723]. IPsec is mandatory-to-implement for IPS clients and
servers. Thus, all IP storage clients, including those invoking SLP,
can be assumed to support IPsec. SLP servers, however, cannot be
assumed to implement IPsec, since there is no such requirement in
standard SLP. In particular, SLP Directory Agents (DA) may be
running on machines other than those running the IPS protocols.
IPsec SHOULD be implemented for SLPv2 as specified in [RFC3723]; this
includes ESP with a non-null transform to provide both authentication
and confidentiality.
Because the IP storage services have their own authentication
capabilities when located, SLPv2 authentication is OPTIONAL to
implement and use (as discussed in more detail in [RFC3723]).
7. IANA Considerations
This document describes two SLP Templates in Section 5. They should
be registered in the IANA "SVRLOC Templates" registry. This process
is described in the IANA Considerations section of [RFC2609].
8. Internationalization Considerations
SLP allows internationalized strings to be registered and retrieved.
Attributes in the template that are not marked with an 'L' (literal)
will be registered in a localized manner. An "en" (English)
localization MUST be registered, and others MAY be registered.
9. Summary
This document describes how SLPv2 can be used by FCIP Entities to
find other FCIP Entities. Service type templates for FCIP Entities
are presented.
10. Acknowledgements
This document was produced by the FCIP discovery team, including Todd
Sperry (Adaptec), Larry Lamars (SanValley), Robert Snively (Brocade),
Ravi Natarajan (Lightsand), Anil Rijhsinghani (McData), and Venkat
Rangan (Rhapsody Networks). Thanks also to Mark Bakke (Cisco) for
initial help and consultation, and David Black, Erik Guttman, and
James Kempf for assistance during expert review.
Peterson Standards Track [Page 9]
RFC 3822 Finding FCIP Entities Using SLPv2 July 2004
11. References
11.1. Normative References
[RFC2608] Guttman, E., Perkins, C., Veizades, J. and M. Day,
"Service Location Protocol, Version 2", RFC 2608, June
1999.
[RFC2609] Guttman, E., Perkins, C. and J. Kempf, "Service Templates
and Service: Schemes", RFC 2609, June 1999.
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key Words for Use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
[RFC3821] Rajagopal, M., Bhagwat, R. and R. Weber, "Fibre Channel
Over TCP/IP (FCIP)", RFC 3821, July 2004.
[FC-SW-3] Fibre Channel Switch Fabric - 3, ANSI INCITS 384-2004.
[FC-BB-2] Fibre Channel Backbone - 2, ANSI INCITS 372-2003.
[FC-FS] Fibre Channel Framing and Signaling, T11 Project 1331-D,
Rev 1.90, April 9, 2003.
[RFC3723] Aboba, B., Tseng, J., Walker, J., Rangan, V. and F.
Travostino, "Securing Block Storage Protocols over IP",
RFC 3723, April 2004.
11.2. Informative References
[RFC3105] Kempf, J. and G. Montenegro, "Finding an RSIP Server with
SLP", RFC 3105, October 2001.
12. Author's Address
David Peterson
Computer Network Technology (CNT)
6000 Nathan Lane North
Minneapolis, MN 55442
Phone: 763-268-6139
EMail: dap@cnt.com
Peterson Standards Track [Page 10]
RFC 3822 Finding FCIP Entities Using SLPv2 July 2004
13. Full Copyright Statement
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2004). This document is subject
to the rights, licenses and restrictions contained in BCP 78, and
except as set forth therein, the authors retain all their rights.
This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
"AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET
ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE
INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Intellectual Property
The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information
on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
http://www.ietf.org/ipr.
The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at ietf-
ipr@ietf.org.
Acknowledgement
Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
Internet Society.
Peterson Standards Track [Page 11]