patch-2.4.20 linux-2.4.20/arch/mips/dec/time.c
Next file: linux-2.4.20/arch/mips/dec/wbflush.c
Previous file: linux-2.4.20/arch/mips/dec/setup.c
Back to the patch index
Back to the overall index
- Lines: 39
- Date:
Thu Nov 28 15:53:10 2002
- Orig file:
linux-2.4.19/arch/mips/dec/time.c
- Orig date:
Fri Aug 2 17:39:43 2002
diff -urN linux-2.4.19/arch/mips/dec/time.c linux-2.4.20/arch/mips/dec/time.c
@@ -110,7 +110,7 @@
: "r" (count), "r" (quotient));
/*
- * Due to possible jiffies inconsistencies, we need to check
+ * Due to possible jiffies inconsistencies, we need to check
* the result so that we'll get a timer that is monotonic.
*/
if (res >= USECS_PER_JIFFY)
@@ -160,9 +160,9 @@
return res;
}
-/* This function must be called with interrupts disabled
+/* This function must be called with interrupts disabled
* It was inspired by Steve McCanne's microtime-i386 for BSD. -- jrs
- *
+ *
* However, the pc-audio speaker driver changes the divisor so that
* it gets interrupted rather more often - it loads 64 into the
* counter rather than 11932! This has an adverse impact on
@@ -176,7 +176,7 @@
* using either the RTC or the 8253 timer. The decision would be
* based on whether there was any other device around that needed
* to trample on the 8253. I'd set up the RTC to interrupt at 1024 Hz,
- * and then do some jiggery to have a version of do_timer that
+ * and then do some jiggery to have a version of do_timer that
* advanced the clock by 1/1024 s. Every time that reached over 1/100
* of a second, then do all the old code. If the time was kept correct
* then do_gettimeoffset could just return 0 - there is no low order
@@ -187,7 +187,7 @@
* often than every 120 us or so.
*
* Anyway, this needs more thought.... pjsg (1993-08-28)
- *
+ *
* If you are really that interested, you should be reading
* comp.protocols.time.ntp!
*/
FUNET's LINUX-ADM group, linux-adm@nic.funet.fi
TCL-scripts by Sam Shen (who was at: slshen@lbl.gov)