patch-2.3.48 linux/arch/mips/ddb5074/int-handler.S
Next file: linux/arch/mips/ddb5074/irq.c
Previous file: linux/arch/mips/ddb5074/Makefile
Back to the patch index
Back to the overall index
- Lines: 125
- Date:
Thu Feb 24 22:52:30 2000
- Orig file:
v2.3.47/linux/arch/mips/ddb5074/int-handler.S
- Orig date:
Wed Dec 31 16:00:00 1969
diff -u --recursive --new-file v2.3.47/linux/arch/mips/ddb5074/int-handler.S linux/arch/mips/ddb5074/int-handler.S
@@ -0,0 +1,124 @@
+/*
+ * arch/mips/ddb5074/int-handler.S -- NEC DDB Vrc-5074 interrupt handler
+ *
+ * Based on arch/mips/sgi/kernel/indyIRQ.S
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 1996 David S. Miller (dm@engr.sgi.com)
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2000 Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@sonycom.com>
+ * Sony Suprastructure Center Europe (SUPC-E), Brussels
+ *
+ * $Id: int-handler.S,v 1.2 2000/01/27 02:06:56 ralf Exp $
+ */
+
+#include <asm/asm.h>
+#include <asm/mipsregs.h>
+#include <asm/regdef.h>
+#include <asm/stackframe.h>
+
+ /* A lot of complication here is taken away because:
+ *
+ * 1) We handle one interrupt and return, sitting in a loop
+ * and moving across all the pending IRQ bits in the cause
+ * register is _NOT_ the answer, the common case is one
+ * pending IRQ so optimize in that direction.
+ *
+ * 2) We need not check against bits in the status register
+ * IRQ mask, that would make this routine slow as hell.
+ *
+ * 3) Linux only thinks in terms of all IRQs on or all IRQs
+ * off, nothing in between like BSD spl() brain-damage.
+ *
+ * Furthermore, the IRQs on the INDY look basically (barring
+ * software IRQs which we don't use at all) like:
+ *
+ * MIPS IRQ Source
+ * -------- ------
+ * 0 Software (ignored)
+ * 1 Software (ignored)
+ * 2 Local IRQ level zero
+ * 3 Local IRQ level one
+ * 4 8254 Timer zero
+ * 5 8254 Timer one
+ * 6 Bus Error
+ * 7 R4k timer (what we use)
+ *
+ * We handle the IRQ according to _our_ priority which is:
+ *
+ * Highest ---- R4k Timer
+ * Local IRQ zero
+ * Local IRQ one
+ * Bus Error
+ * 8254 Timer zero
+ * Lowest ---- 8254 Timer one
+ *
+ * then we just return, if multiple IRQs are pending then
+ * we will just take another exception, big deal.
+ */
+
+ .text
+ .set noreorder
+ .set noat
+ .align 5
+ NESTED(ddbIRQ, PT_SIZE, sp)
+ SAVE_ALL
+ CLI
+ .set at
+ mfc0 s0, CP0_CAUSE # get irq mask
+
+#if 1
+ mfc0 t2,CP0_STATUS # get enabled interrupts
+ and s0,t2 # isolate allowed ones
+#endif
+ /* First we check for r4k counter/timer IRQ. */
+ andi a0, s0, CAUSEF_IP2 # delay slot, check local level zero
+ beq a0, zero, 1f
+ andi a0, s0, CAUSEF_IP3 # delay slot, check local level one
+
+ /* Wheee, local level zero interrupt. */
+ jal ddb_local0_irqdispatch
+ move a0, sp # delay slot
+
+ j ret_from_irq
+ nop # delay slot
+
+1:
+ beq a0, zero, 1f
+ andi a0, s0, CAUSEF_IP6 # delay slot, check bus error
+
+ /* Wheee, local level one interrupt. */
+ move a0, sp
+ jal ddb_local1_irqdispatch
+ nop
+
+ j ret_from_irq
+ nop
+
+1:
+ beq a0, zero, 1f
+ nop
+
+ /* Wheee, an asynchronous bus error... */
+ move a0, sp
+ jal ddb_buserror_irq
+ nop
+
+ j ret_from_irq
+ nop
+
+1:
+ /* Here by mistake? This is possible, what can happen
+ * is that by the time we take the exception the IRQ
+ * pin goes low, so just leave if this is the case.
+ */
+ andi a0, s0, (CAUSEF_IP4 | CAUSEF_IP5)
+ beq a0, zero, 1f
+
+ /* Must be one of the 8254 timers... */
+ move a0, sp
+ jal ddb_8254timer_irq
+ nop
+1:
+ j ret_from_irq
+ nop
+ END(ddbIRQ)
FUNET's LINUX-ADM group, linux-adm@nic.funet.fi
TCL-scripts by Sam Shen (who was at: slshen@lbl.gov)